Parabkaran Life Stoy For Free Public Full

This reads and sounds very much like gender mainstreaming and womens empowerment but y et the water sector has been strongly resistant to accomplishing this. 3 The Dublin Principles include all waters no matter how they are conceptualised and divided in law and in practice.

Mozambique, South Africa, Tanzania and Zimbabwe are members of SADC and have signed the SADC Protocol on Women and other international human rights instruments.

However, we do not see an incorporation of these instruments and other empowerment frameworks into water policies.

We find that Principle No.

Integrated Water Resource Management (IWRM).

In examining the gender practices in these four nations of Africa, gender equality remains distant from the concerns of the water sector.

We enumerate many of the commonalities among these countries in how they are marginalising womens access to, and use of, water.

Parabkaran Life Stoy For Free Public Full

Discover the worlds research 20 million members 135 million publications 700k research projects Join for free Public Full-texts 2 IWRM and Gender Derman and Prabhakaran WA Vol 9 (3).pdf Content available from Bill Derman: IWRM and Gender Derman and Prabhakaran WA Vol 9 (3).pdf IWRM and Gender Derman and Prabhakaran WA Vol 9 (3).pdf Content uploaded by Bill Derman Author content All content in this area was uploaded by Bill Derman on Dec 02, 2016 Content may be subject to copyright.

IWRM and Gender Derman and Prabhakaran WA Vol 9 (3).pdf Content available from Bill Derman: IWRM and Gender Derman and Prabhakaran WA Vol 9 (3).pdf IWRM and Gender Derman and Prabhakaran WA Vol 9 (3).pdf Content uploaded by Bill Derman Author content All content in this area was uploaded by Bill Derman on Dec 02, 2016 Content may be subject to copyright.

Water Alternatives 9(3): 64 4- 66 1 Derman and Prabhakaran: IWRM in southern Africa from a gender perspective Page 644 Reflections on the Formulation and Implementation o f IWRM in Southern Africa from a Gender Perspective Bill Derman Norwegian University of the Life Sciences, Department of In ternational Environment and Development Studies, Aas, Norway; bill.dermannmbu.no Preetha Prabhakaran Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK; preethap bgmail.com ABSTRACT: While it is claimed that the foun ding principles of integrated water resources m anagement are the Dublin Principles this does not appear to be the case for Principle No.

Mozambiq ue, South Africa, Tanzania and Zimbabwe are members of SADC and have signed the SADC Proto col on Women and other international human rights instruments.

Integrated Water Re source Management (IWRM).

In examining the gender practices in these four nations of Africa, gender equality remains distant from the concerns of th e water sector.

We enumerate many of the commonalities among these countries in how they are margin alising womens access t o, a nd use of, water.

KEYWORDS: Gender, IWRM, Dublin Principles, southern A frica I NTRODUCTION This article focuses on one aspect of the more general Flows and P ractices project: What has been the place and importance of womens equality in the rolling o ut and implementation of Integrated Water Resource Management (IWRM) What have been the policies and strategies promoted and followed to ensure that women we re included in all phases of the old and new institutions tasked with formulating IWRM at the various level s involved in water governance and manag ement How have the general gender policies of the four nations been inclu ded in the water sector If womens management of water has not figured centrally to date what are the implications for their access to land and water in the context of large-scale water and land appropriati on The IWRM discourse recognises women as important stakeholders in achieving the stated goals of efficiency, equity and environmental sustainability (GWP, 2006).

It advocates for gender-sensitive approaches in the implementation of IWRM principles in order to ensure womens greater involvement in water management (ibid).

But, does this focus on women address gender issues that shape differential access to water While policy interventions to address issues of inequitable water allocation and distribution have included gender in the overall field of v ision (Seager, 2010), this focus has often been limited to represen ting women either as a separate add- on category, or as a vulnerable and homogenous group with undifferentiated interests (Cornwall et al., 2007; Rathgber, 2003.).

This narrow vision tends to overlook o r oversimplify issu es of ge ndered power relations, which lie at the core of inequality that determine ones acc ess to, use of, and control over, water resources (Prabhakaran, 2013 ).

The focus on gender is important because IWRM has influenced water -sector reforms around the world, where gender relations shaped within specific socio -political histories, have led to vast inequalities in access to, and distribution of, water.

Policy framings o n gender have emphasised gender sensitivity and gender mainstreaming.

It is a strategy for making womens as well as mens concerns and exp eriences an integral dimension of the design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of policies and programmes in all political, econ omic and societal spheres so that women and men benefit equally and inequality is not perpetuated.

The ultimate goal is to achieve gender equality.

The implementation o f the four Dublin Principles 2 is at the heart of IWRM although Principle No.

It reads: Principle N o.

Women play a central part in the provision, manage ment an d safegu arding of water.

It goes on to state: This pivotal role of women as providers and users of water and guardian s of the living environment has seldom been reflected in institu tional arrangements for the development and managem ent of water resources.

Acceptance and implementation of this principle require positive policies to address wom ens specific needs and to equip and empower women to participate at all levels in water resources programmes, including decision making and implementation, in ways defined by them.

This reads and sounds very much like gender mainstreaming and womens empowerment but y et the water sector has been strongly resistant to accomplishing this.

The Dublin Principles include all waters no matter how they are conceptualised and divided in law and in practice.

Parabkaran Life Stoy Pdf